Globalization has diversified actors, institutions, norms and instruments in the international legal arena. Diversification is accompanied by increasing specialization and therefore by an organization around so-called regimes. The idea that international legal orders can exist autonomously has long been refuted; Indeed, any regime is based to some extent on general international law. When the regimes are not autonomous,. They bring an international perspective to New Zealand legal issues. Kate and Michael have both worked internationally as lawyers in the United States and Australia, respectively, with postgraduate degrees in environmental/administrative law (Kate) and employment law (Michael). Nicole has worked in London for over 12 years and holds a recent UK professional certificate and regularly advises on English legal matters. Michael has been involved in a wide range of Maori-related work, including regular appearances before the Maori Land Court and the Maori Court of Appeal. He has represented clients before the Waitangi Tribunal. He also assists clients in various Maori land matters, including divisions, trust formation and administration, disposals and inheritances, and the publication of a number of scholarly articles on Maori legal issues. Michael has extensive experience in handling commercial disputes.
With a degree in business and professional experience in accounting, Michael is able to provide sound technical advice in commercial matters. These include corporate matters, insolvency issues, contractual and tortious claims. He has written for legal publications on the law of negligence. The results of the QMUL-White & Case International Arbitration Survey 2021 were published on the 6th. May 2021. The survey explores the theme “Adapting Arbitration to a Changing World”: how international arbitration has adapted to changing requirements and circumstances, including the COVID-19 pandemic, and how the international arbitration community can adapt more and better. Mauao Legal Chambers in Mount Maunganui consists of local lawyers Kate Barry-Piceno, Michael Sharp and Nicole Smith. The Danish Arbitration Institute (DIA) updated its arbitration rules this year. The 2021 DIA Arbitration Rules (the 2021 DIA Rules) apply to arbitrations commenced on or after April 13, 2021, unless otherwise agreed. The updated rules tell us that the DIA emphasizes best practices, pragmatism and efficiency, and that they are. Conflicts of interest between parties and arbitrators are common in arbitration.
However, academia has not yet considered whether adjudicative institutions can also enter into conflicts of interest. This paper will address this issue and will also explore measures that can mitigate these risks of conflicts of interest for adjudicative institutions. That. This paper discusses the conceptual underpinnings and theoretical rationale for the practice of counterclaims in investment arbitration. First, it is important to distinguish this contribution from an analysis of case law on counterclaims in investment arbitration, as detailed reports on the counterclaim debate can be found in practice here, here and here. The same goes for this post. Michael holds a specialized graduate degree in labour law and has authored and presented scientific papers at conferences in the field. Michael Sharp is a lawyer specialising in commercial litigation, labour and Maori matters. Michael was previously a partner at Holland Beckett in Tauranga. He has experience in representation at all levels of courts and tribunals and has extensive experience in mediation. The latest draft law submitted to the Ukrainian Parliament would introduce new regulations imposing stricter requirements on the establishment of national arbitration institutions (“treteyskyi south”), while establishing a framework for the creation of new international arbitration institutions in Ukraine. This appears to be the latest legislative initiative in the context of recent reforms.
The 2016 Russian arbitration reform (the “Reform”) marked a turning point for both arbitration practitioners and arbitration institutions. One of the most important effects of the reform has been that so-called “corporate” conflicts (whose definition includes a large number of post-merger and acquisition disputes, including those arising from share purchase agreements and shareholders` agreements) will be reduced to . Kate, Michael and Nicole are all seasoned practitioners (each practicing for over 20 years) with extensive expertise in a range of industries and areas of law. They advise their clients in a concise, strategic and well-founded manner. Thanks to Mauao`s new legal chambers, they offer nationally recognized expertise without the excessive fee rates of metropolitan law firms. Michael brings both a problem-solving approach to his practice, with the goal of achieving a positive solution for his clients in a timely and cost-effective manner. In this way, Michael provides clients with an analysis of problems and prospects for success at an early stage of litigation and leads them to possible solutions such as direct negotiations or mediation. Michael has experience in mediating a number of disputes. It encourages an analytical approach to risks to help parties find solutions.
It is able to provide rooms for mediation discussions. In a field as competitive as arbitration, international reputation is acquired and not created overnight. In 2021, various judgments of the Spanish Constitutional Court (see here, here and here) abolished some of the jurisprudence of the subordinate courts of Madrid, which favored a full review of arbitral awards and affected the finality of the arbitration procedure (see here and here). Spain is. Michael also has experience with leaky construction claims. He has represented clients before the Watertight Homes Resolution Service. This is another area where he has contributed to scientific papers. When I took office as Secretary General of the Finnish Arbitration Institute (FAI) almost two years ago, I really wanted to understand what we do and how we can reach our full potential.
I was part of the arbitration community, I refereeed, taught and researched long enough to . The London Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI), a networking and support organisation for London`s business community, launched the London Chamber of Arbitration and Mediation (LCAM) in May 2020. I wrote a post when I was reviewing the first arbitration rules of the CFMA and examining some aspects of the CAML as an institution. The last two. Delos Dispute Resolution (Delos) introduced its first significant update to the Delos Arbitration Rules (the Delos Rules 2021), which entered into force on November 1, 2021. The new rules range from new rules that adapt to other large arbitration institutions, such as membership and consolidation, to more radical innovations such as. The Vienna International Arbitration Centre (“VIAC”) announces its latest update to the VIAC Rules for Arbitration and Mediation (VIAC Arbitration and Mediation Rules 2021), which will enter into force on 1 July 2021. The revision of VIAC`s Arbitration and Mediation Rules was triggered by the development of VIAC`s new independent tariff. Kate Barry-Piceno has extensive experience in resource management law and is involved in various projects in New Zealand. In addition, she has extensive experience in municipal, administrative and labour law. Nicole Smith is Vice-Chair of the Arbitrators` and Mediators` Institute of New Zealand (AMINZ), New Zealand`s leading organisation of dispute resolution specialists. In addition to her work at AMINTZ, Nicole is also an attorney at Mauao Legal Chambers, specializing in commercial litigation and arbitration.
Double degree in New Zealand and England. In mid-February, after a high-profile diplomatic battle between EU member states, the EU unveiled its proposal to change the ECT definition for the “economic sector in the energy sector” (EAES). The announcement eased fears that talks within the EU on the issue could fail. To the extent that it contains a vision of amendments that.. Michael also handles probate litigation and relational ownership issues with complex business and fiduciary aspects. He has experience appearing before the Family Court and the Supreme Court on these issues. Two years after its publication, the draft code of conduct for arbitrators in international investment disputes is still under consideration and refinement by States and other stakeholders participating in UNCITRAL Working Group III (WG III). This evolving tool, jointly developed by the ICSID and UNCITRAL secretariats, is the first attempt.